I just recently heard
yet another news story about a state (California) proposing to cut massive amounts of money to education (and
you know art education is right up there at the top of the cut). Immediately
following was a story about a deceased movie star’s jewels fetching over 100 million dollars at auction. Okay, am I the only one who sees the irony in
this? 100 million for jewels from an actor, while cutting millions from
education? Where are these jewel-buyers when education is on the line? And if
those buyers are from foreign countries, shame on them, too, because we’re in a
world-wide recession. Unfortunately, it isn’t just 21st century
entitlement. Has valuing the acquisition of art with a “pedigree” over the
educating children always been the norm? Could somebody spending 9 million dollars on a ring possibly think of
donating that much money to a local school district? Or another more worthy
cause? Please!
To illustrate this point, let’s look at the case of Vincent van Gogh. During his lifetime, van Gogh
struggled with acceptance as an artist and for sales. He epitomized the artist who loved nature and expressed that through his
paintings. He also epitomized the artist who struggled to get his art
recognized, but ended his life feeling he was a failure. He only sold one painting during his lifetime.
The last year of his death, van Gogh became recognized in
many countries of northern Europe. Within a couple of years of his death,
imitators appeared copying his work. By the 1920s, copies of van Gogh’s work
clouded the true number of legitimate works attributable to the artist. So,
within ten years of van Gogh’s death, people were making money from his style.
(I’m sorry, but this doesn’t even look like an
early van Gogh to me.) I think this is equally contemptible as people
paying millions of dollars for Hollywood jewelry, no matter how beautifully
it’s made.
As the income gap widens and people speak their minds about
inequality, times such as these should help us reevaluate our priorities.
Perhaps the “one percenters” of the world will finally see the value of quality
education for all (and thus higher quality of life) over mere material
possessions.



